Interpreting SIMPLS regression results in R -


I have a SIMPLS regression in R, but I'm not sure how the result can be understood, how does this look like my function,
  yarn.simpls & lt; -mvr (pcubes ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = dtj, verification = "cv", method = "simple")   

and this is my result

 Summary (yarn.simpls) x Dimensions: 33471 3 y Dimensions: 33471 1 Fit method: simpls are considered number of components: 3 Certification: RMSEP cross-vested 10 using random sections (blocking) 1 Compose 2 composse 3 Composive CV 0.572 9 0.4449 0.4263 0.4175 NJCA 0.572 9 0.4449 0.4263 0.4175 Training:% Variance Explained 1 Compos2 Composse 3 Compose X 86.77 97.67 100 Pubes 39.74 44.72 47   

Or I would like to know whether my coefficient? Is this line of integrity under the ANCCW: RMSE Training:% Variance is like the importance of variables? I just want to make sure that I interpret the result correctly. The description of% Variance describes how many variables differ from each encampy, and then reaction variables, so it can be thought about the relative potential of each NMPPS to get information in your data.

CV & amp; The value for the ADCV route is that there is a squared error of Predict (RMSEP), which is giving you information that each Encompy model estimates the variable of the result. In your case, with one component, one model has the most estimated power.

If you want the coefficient of the underlying variable, use coef (yarn.simpls) . It will give you what will be variable coefficients in each encampy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Java - Error: no suitable method found for add(int, java.lang.String) -

java - JPA TypedQuery: Parameter value element did not match expected type -

c++ - static template member variable has internal linkage but is not defined -