asp.net web api - MiniProfiler with Web.API 2; is there a global magic request context object? -


I am trying to set up a miniprofile on my Web API site, and MiniProfiler.Current to work.

I followed the guidelines at miniprofiler.com, and the following is global. Ax: 

  protected zero application_Start () {MiniProfilerEF6.Initialize (); // Other setup} Safe void Application_BeginRequest () {// UI MiniProfiler.Start () is required to be started here to present; } Secure Zero application_EndRequest () {MiniProfiler.Stop (); }   
 This uses the default, which stores the actual code in  HttpContext.Current.Items .  
 When I  miniprofiler Current , this  HTTCPN.NET Current .  
 when I request one of my web API URLs:  
     
  •   creates the application_BuyRequest  profile, Code> HttpContext.Current   
  •  can store in a Web API  MessageHandler  in a Web API  IActionFilter ,  HttpContext. Current  in  HttpContext.Current   
  •  See now, and try my  MiniProfiler.Current.Step ("Administrator: Action")  failed Gets  
  •  different services to my EF queries Running is not recorded because it depends on the MiniPropiler Hook  MiniProfiler.Current , which is the  HTTP Consort. Current , which is no longer valid  
  •   Application_EndRequest  fire, and  httpctx The current  is magically back, and so it wrappers the profiler and tells me when this request has started   
     I opened the code, and I used my own  IProfileProvider I can create, store more reliable programmer objects than  HttpContext.Current , but I do not know where it can be.  
     I spend a few hours, t find a practical solution:  
       
    •   IProfileProvider  is a global variable; Either all worker threads in the MVC or Web API pipeline will have to use the same  IProfileProvider   
    • , I request that the Web API RequestContext to exclude the HTTP Context. Can I move around in properties? , But it does not really help because my  IProfileProvider  is global in the entire app; If I ask it to store the profile in HttpContext A, then any request for other HTTC Contexts is going to pollute the profile  
    •  I rely on any kind of threadstodge due to the async I can not wait / reuse the thread dynamically  
    •  I can not stick the profile object in Ninject binding from  InRequestScope  because  InRequestScope  Web API does not work with 2.1, but even if I  
    •  everyone  httpexquest message Properties  New  HTTPPTC.Internet ITEMS , but still,  IProfileProvider  is a global variable and I have no way of ensuring that each request is being viewed on their version  HttpRequestMessage   MiniProfiler.Current  can be called from anywhere, so I think the global  IProfileProvider  will have to inspect the call stack and there  HttpRequestMessage  Need to find? It seems like madness.   
       I am at a loss, what exactly do I want to do.   
       
       
       I understood the process of putting together the question  HttpContext.Current  When you are waiting for Async / things:  
       I had to configure the web. My filter was adjusted to change when configured, and using  Miniprofiler.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - passing input text from view to contoller with FacebookContext using Facebook app -

I'm trying to pass an input text from the viewer to the controller in the Facebook Birthday app: Link to app: In the Home Controller [FacebookAuthorize ("email", "user_photos")] Public async Tasks & lt; ActionResult & gt; Index (FacebookContext reference) {if (ModelState.IsValid) {var user = waiting for reference. Client.Gate CurrentUserAsync & lt; MyAppUser & gt; (); View return (user); } See Return ("Error"); } [Http post] [facebook authorized ("email", "user_photo")) public async task & lieutenant; Actionsclass & gt; Index (string textile, facebookcontonte context) {if (ModelState.IsValid) {var user = wait context.Client.GetCurrentUserAsync & lt; MyAppUser & gt; (); // See my code, see the use of txt here (user); } See Return ("Error"); } View: @using facebookpostc.models @ Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Facebook.models using @ Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc. Facebook @model MyAppUser @ {ViewB...
Read more

ios - Does Core Data autoupdate a many to many relationship on saving -

I have used 2 database tables and core data / NSManagedObjects in SQLite: User is user_id name group (multiple groups) Group group_id title group members (multiple users) By using core data to save a group and adding users ( Add to group) as follows: group * cordata = zero; Cordata = [NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName: @ Managed Object Contains in "Groups": Reference]; Request = [NSFetchRequest fetchRequestWithEntityName: @ "user"]; Request.predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat: @ "user_id =% @", user_id]; Result = [reference executeFetchRequest: request error: & amp; Error]; CoreData.group_id = group_id Cordettitle = Title [Cordata AdGroupMailersObject: [Last objections result]]; Is it right to say that core data manages a user with multiple users and groups with the code above? Yes, if the relationships are in the form of each other's inverse relationship The inverse relationships are updated automaticall...
Read more

Calling a C++ function from C# by passing a string with variable size to it -

I am calling a string with a C + code and calling from the C # code. The C ++ function is responsible for filling the string material. The following code is: C #party: var abc = new string builder (4096); // will have to change this var result = Basic methods. SignCrcFile (ABC); C ++: bool __cdecl SignCrcFile (char * abc) {... char * tempStr = "hello all"; // for example // copy it to ABC string strcpy (ABC, tempStr); Back true; } The problem is that tempStr's size in the C ++ function is dynamic (the above assignment for TempStr is only an example). In such a case, it is not a hard code that the size of ABC string is in the size of 4096 bytes on the C #. The first solution can be a solution to create 2 functions on the C ++ side to get the size of the string. Then allocate that size using StringBuilder in the C # side then use the next function to bring the entire string from C ++ to the C #. But no suggestion this may not be the most optimal way? ...
Read more